Showing All 10 Matching Links Found
Tag(s) Selected:  Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Search:
:
   + Advanced Options        Search Tips        Legend
     


2/22/2012 Davis votes to support repeal of Citizens United ruling
Yesterday, the city of Davis voted unanimously to support Assembly Joint Resolution 22. The text of the resolution passed by the Davis city council can be found here. AJR 22 is working its way through California's state legislature; the bill would urge Congress to begin the process of a Constitutional Amendment in order to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling. The Citizens United Supreme Court decision is what allows Corporations and "Super PACS" to spend unlimited funds on any individual candidate or party they choose. Davis joins New York City and Portland in calling on Congress to begin the process of a Constitutional Amendment for campaign finance reform. The effort in Davis, like in these other cities, was spearheaded by the Occupy Davis group. Occupy is developed growing momentum for repealing the Citizens United ruling that many see as swinging the door of corruption completely open. (Examiner)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 2/28/12                   0       3
#1 



2/19/2012 Justices Signal High Court May Rethink Citizens United: Ginsburg, Breyer say real-world results rebut original ruling
The Supreme Court on Friday blocked a Montana Supreme Court ruling against corporate campaign funding, appearing once again to support the unlimited corporate spending it allowed with the Citizens United case of 2010. But maybe not? Comments in Friday's order by justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer hint that they're unhappy with the results of that infamous case, reports the Washington Post. (Newser)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 2/20/12                   0       6
#2 



5/23/2011 Justices, 5-4, Tell California to Cut Prisoner Population
Conditions in California’s overcrowded prisons are so bad that they violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday, ordering the state to reduce its prison population by more than 30,000 inmates. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the majority in a 5-to-4 decision that broke along ideological lines, described a prison system that failed to deliver minimal care to prisoners with serious medical and mental health problems and produced “needless suffering and death.” Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel A. Alito Jr. filed vigorous dissents. Justice Scalia called the order affirmed by the majority “perhaps the most radical injunction issued by a court in our nation’s history.” Justice Alito said “the majority is gambling with the safety of the people of California.” The majority opinion included photographs of inmates crowded into open gymnasium-style rooms and what Justice Kennedy described as “telephone-booth-sized cages without toilets” used to house suicidal inmates. Suicide rates in the state’s prisons, Justice Kennedy wrote, have been 80 percent higher than the average for inmates nationwide. A lower court in the case said it was “an uncontested fact” that “an inmate in one of California’s prisons needlessly dies every six or seven days due to constitutional deficiencies.” Monday’s ruling in the case, Brown v. Plata, No. 09-1233, affirmed an order by a special three-judge federal court requiring state officials to reduce the prison population to 110,000, which is 137.5 percent of the system’s capacity. There have been more than 160,000 inmates in the system in recent years, and there are now more than 140,000. Prison release orders are rare and hard to obtain, and even advocates for prisoners’ rights said Monday’s decision was unlikely to have a significant impact around the nation. “California is an extreme case by any measure,” said David C. Fathi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Prison Project, which submitted a brief urging the justices to uphold the lower court’s order. “This case involves ongoing, undisputed and lethal constitutional violations. We’re not going to see a lot of copycat litigation.” State officials in California will have two years to comply with the order, and they may ask for more time. Justice Kennedy emphasized that the reduction in population need not be achieved solely by releasing prisoners early. Among the other possibilities, he said, are new construction, transfers out of state and using county facilities. (New York Times)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 5/27/11                   0       7
#3 



5/17/2011 Smell Pot? SCOTUS Kills 4th Amendment
The Supreme Court says police can enter your home without a warrant, if they smell marijuana, and if when knocking on the door, they hear what sounds like the destruction of evidence. But apparently, by making sounds like destruction of evidence like flushing a toilet, police can come in. Students for Sensible Drug Policy's Aaron Houston discusses. (Russia Today)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 5/18/11      
            		 0       7
#4 



7/16/2009 Rep. Denounces Ginsberg Eugenics Comment on House Floor
Populations We Don't Want To Have Too Many Of (CSPAN)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 7/21/09      
            		 1       8
#5 



7/14/2009 Ruth Bader Ginsburg and a question of eugenics
After the Supreme Court justice's comments in a recent interview, I would like to know if she believes some populations are in need of shrinking through abortion (Los Angeles Times)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 7/21/09                   0       9
#6 



7/14/2009 Does Ruth Bader Ginsburg Support Eugenics?
There's been much less chatter about this on liberal blogs, but Media Matters argues that Ginsburg was speaking about public opinion about Roe and abortion, not about her own opinion (US News & World Report)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 7/21/09                   0       9
#7 



7/13/2009 Mainstream media ignores astonishing comment by Ruth Bader Ginsburg on eugenics and Roe v. Wade (Examiner)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 7/21/09                   0       10
#8 



7/7/2009 The Place of Women on the Court
Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (New York Times)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 7/17/09                   0       10
#9 



1/6/2009 Congress' plan would let AG 'ban guns at will': 2nd Amendment critics are 'ready to run wild'
A perfect storm is developing for Second Amendment opponents that could allow President-elect Barack Obama's choice for attorney general – Eric Holder – to "ban guns at will" despite the 2008 affirmation from the U.S. Supreme Court that U.S. citizens have a right to bear arms. The situation was described with alarm by Alan Korwin, author of Gun Laws of America, in a recent commentary. (World Net Daily)
+ Show URL
 & ALL Tags
posted: 7/25/10                   0       4
#10 




Showing All 10 Matching Links Found